Election Awakening

Standard

Congratulations to the 176 voters in #Bedford and 120 in #Luton North, 10 in Luton South who have realized that the whole political system is a puppet show and wisely spoilt their ballot paper. This demonstrates that there are 100’s of people in the county who have woken up to the farce.

For anyone who continues to be deluded into believing we have just had an election then let us explain….

First, let us not forget that Treason May had absolutely no reason to call the election. Several CON MP’s were facing prosecution for election fraud but so were some Labour one’s and who is to say that she may well have won all the ensuing by elections.

The Poll’s gave her a massive majority but can we trust the Polls? No…

Was this the worse performance by any incumbent at an Election, to the point that one might ask did she try to throw it? Yes…

So the only real outcome has been that the prospect of Brexit has diminished, not that it was ever going to happen, but in the public’s mind it is now less likely.

Has Corbyn won and May lost? No…. why not well because they are the same body i.e. the LIBLABCON pact.

So who has won? … Common Purpose who control all the mainstream parties.

So who has lost? …. the people of UK who have been fooled (mostly) into believing we have a voice, that Corbyn will improve things and that we are not really all slaves…. well with the notable exception of the 306 voters the Forum has been able to identify as being awake… fancy joining them?

Ten reasons why dads matter

Standard

Some people think your job only starts when your son can kick a ball or your daughter needs a chauffeur. But the 700+ research papers published annually prove beyond doubt that paternity is indispensable.

Taken from He’s Having A Baby by Jack O’Sullivan

Ten reasons why you matter:

1. Who else, other than mum, will tuck her into bed at night, teach her how to ride a bike, fund her first holiday with friends and buy her first pint?

2. He’s got your genes. You are a part of his history, who he is, how he looks, right down to those big ears and awkward gait.

3. You matter to your partner, too. When you get stuck in from the start, breastfeeding is more successful and she is less likely to suffer from postnatal depression.

4. You’ll raise brainy kids. Children with involved fathers have better social skills when they reach nursery and do better in examinations at 16.

5. Being a good dad keeps your child sane. Father-child closeness is a crucial predictor of long-term mental health.

6. Successful professional women tend to have at least one thing in common: fathers who respect and encourage them.

7. Do well as a father and, when your child’s time comes, she’ll be a better mum.

8. You’ll keep him out of the clink. Good fathering means your son is less likely to have a criminal record.

9. She’ll be happier later: father involvement at age 7 is correlated with your daughter’s contentment with love at 33.

10. Do you want your child to have higher self-esteem, be friendly, and trust others? Your influence makes a difference.

New Petition that we think is worth signing

Standard

We demand Government, Labour and Lib Dems investigate allegations that MPs raped children.

Paedonation

 

PETITION

1.1              We call on the Government, the Labour Party and the Lib Dems to launch investigations into allegations that MPs and peers raped children or conspired to help others to do so during the administrations of John Major and Margaret Thatcher.

1.2              Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem MPs and peers are widely named by child abuse survivors and contemporary witnesses whose personal testimonies mutually corroborate. Moreover, many of the MPs and peers whom child abuse survivors and witnesses identify are still alive; some continue to sit in Parliament, the crimes in which they are implicated covered up and buried.

1.3              The ongoing Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) and police investigations are essential and long overdue. Notwithstanding the IICSA and police inquiries, the Government, Labour Party and Lib Dems must launch their own investigations.

1.4              These should seek out and analyse internal party files; historical complaints by party activists, whistleblowers and employees; and the private records and memories of MPs and peers (deceased, retired and still-serving). Absent proactive and exhaustive investigations by Government and the main parties in Westminster, the IICSA and crime agencies may be unable to discover and consult these crucial sources for evidence of crimes long buried. 

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE

2.1              In a series of investigative news reports in the 1990s, several MPs and peers were averred to be serial child abusers. Their alleged crimes were committed against minors occupying, or recently exited from, children’s homes around the British Isles.

2.2              The reports indicate that certain MPs, peers and others colluded and collaborated in the coordination, planning and covering up of organised abuse episodes. Further, that MPs and peers were present at and took part in said abuse episodes.

2.3              Of the parliamentarians repeatedly implicated in premeditated/organised assaults on children, several continue to hold high-status positions in Government, Her Majesty’s Opposition, the House of Lords and local government in the capital. Many remain members – ostensibly in good standing – of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties.

2.4              In the reams of newsprint devoted to the subject of Establishment paedophilia post Jimmy Savile, many of the ‘hotspots’ of organised paedophile abuse linked to parliamentarians have come into focus.

Hotspot 1:   Islington children’s homes in the 1980s under the oversight of Margaret Hodge, assisted by Keith Vaz as senior solicitor during the period 1982-1985;

Hotspot 2:   Richmond upon Thames children’s homes in the same period, similarly benefiting from the services of in-house solicitor Keith Vaz in 1982 before he transferred to Islington Council (Margaret Hodge);

Hotspot 3:   Westminster City Council real estate in the same period under the oversight of Shirley Porter, whose Tory councillors allegedly partook in ‘paedophile parties’ at Westminster City Council-owned Dolphin Square. Tory parliamentarians, apparatchiks and lobbyists were also involved in these, according to child abuse survivors. Moreover, there was alleged trafficking of children to Central London from Clwyd and Gwynedd children’s homes (see below).

Hotspot 4:   Lambeth Borough Council children’s homes during the same period under the oversight of Janet Boateng, wife of Labour’s Paul Boateng – whom police recently sought to question over his links to former Lambeth Council children’s home manager and convicted paedophile Michael John Carroll;

Hotspot 5:   Wales’ Clwyd and Gwynedd children’s homes, where Conservatives with links to prime minister Margaret Thatcher and Westminster Council’s Dolphin Square reportedly preyed upon the vulnerable residents, trafficking some to child ‘prostitution’ [rape] in London (see above) and elsewhere;

Hotspot 6:   Belfast’s Kincora Boys’ School, also known to have been frequented by paedophile Conservative and Unionist politicians;

Hotspot 7:  The Channel Islands, to whose notorious Haut de la Garenne children’s home it has been reported that local authorities including Birmingham and possibly Islington (Margaret Hodge) sent children in care. Many children at Haut de la Garenne were assaulted, raped or went missing.

2.5              The names of the aforementioned Labour politicians (Margaret Hodge, Keith Vaz, Paul Boateng, Janet Boateng) are not cited in the 1990s investigative news reports. Yet, these Labour politicians almost certainly have important information that an investigation by the Labour Party would need to analyse.

2.6              The 1990s reports do name and implicate several prominent Conservative parliamentarians . They are:

i. Sir Peter Bottomley MP

Sir Edward Leigh MP

Dr Julian Lewis MP

Peter Lilley MP (report)

ii. Cllr Robert Davis (Conservative on Westminster City Council)

iii. Conservative activists and/or possible Conservative Party members:

(David) Russell Walters (who was recently employed in the Mayor of London’s office during the Boris Johnson administration)

Tony Kerpel MBE

Derek Laud (lobbyist, former Parliamentary candidate, and one-time personal friend of former prime minister David Cameron and his wife Samantha)

iv. Retired Conservative parliamentarians – now in some cases local minor celebrities or famous television faces -:

Michael Portillo (report and letter)

Robert George Banks

Michael Russell Brown

Harry Greenway

David John Nicholson

Edwina Currie, while not implicated by the 1990s reports, could have valuable information, given her comments regarding the late Peter Morrison and recent statements by a child abuse survivor.

v. Former Westminster councillors:

Dame Shirley Porter

Peter Martindale

Robert John Moreland

Alex Segal

Miles Young

vi. Turning to the Liberal Democrats:

David (now Lord) Steel (report)

2.7              In order to review the early 1990s investigative news articles which set out specific allegations against the above parliamentarians and others, please visit http://pdfsr.com/pdf/the-child-abuse-investigations

2.8              Supplementary information can be viewed at pdfsr.com/pdf/who-is-murdering-britain-s-children

3.0            We call on the Government, the Labour Party and the Lib Dems to launch investigations into allegations that MPs and peers raped children or conspired to help others to do so during the administrations of John Major and Margaret Thatcher.

https://www.change.org/p/we-call-on-the-government-labour-party-and-lib-dems-to-launch-investigations-into-allegations-that-mps-and-peers-raped-and-assaulted-children-throughout-the-1980s-and-1990s

Female child molesters

Standard

Female sexual abuse of children is frequently hidden in the daily task of care giving. It can happen during bath time, dressing and undressing, and diaper changing. But the abuse is not restricted to care giving; sexual abuse of children can happen any time of the day or night under any number of circumstances. “Women who sexually abuse children can be of any age, social class, intellectual ability, and marital status, and can be involved in any type of employment. They can perpetrate any form of sexual act and can behave seductively or sadistically towards their victims.”[12] In the book Women Who Sexually Abuse Children: From Research to Clinical Practice, the female offenders were classified into three main groups: women who initially target young children, women who initially target adolescents, and women who are initially coerced by men.[12] There were “atypical” perpetrators, however, who did not fall into any of these categories. “Numerous studies have espoused that female sex offenders are not distinctly different from male sex offenders.”[13]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_child_molesters

The 2017 Great Moot of Nottingham Programme

Standard

Be there…. or miss out

 

https://www.britishconstitutiongroup.com/article/2017-great-moot-nottingham-programme-0

Come along with other Bedfordians and realise your potential… the Rule of Law applies to Bedfordshire Police, the worst Police Farce in the country just as much as it does to you… educate ‘Plod’ to be a PEACE officer, not a POLICY officer…stop the Family Courts destroying Families…. help to stop schools destroying our children especially boys… kick the ‘Critical Theorists’ into the long grass….

Hell hath no fury like a women scorned

Standard

Also, women seem to have a special gift for vicious and toxic emotional attacks.

Is boys and men’s violent behaviour taught to them by their mothers?

In broad terms I would say an emotionally abusive mother is a mother who uses her son or daughter in an attempt to fill her own unmet emotional needs. This is similar to defining sexual abuse as someone who uses another person in order to fill their own sexual needs

The fundamental failure of the so called Child Protection system is that is doesn’t protect children. Perhaps ‘Childabuser Protection’ would be more apt.

Almost without exception the organisations fraudulently claiming to fulfil this role at taxpayers expense such Children Services, CAFCASS and the Police fall into the trap of linking the vulnerable child to the mother, whereas in fact the mother is very likely to be the abuser. The blind spot which is designed into the system helps to perpetuate the Children Industry and helps further the aims of the UN by destroying families.

UN Agenda 2030

UN Agenda 2030

If the mother did not feel adequately loved, safe, secure, protected, appreciated, valued, accepted and respected before giving birth, she will, in all likelihood, attempt to use the child (and later the teen) to fill these needs. If she did not feel adequately in control of her own life as a child and teen, she can be expected to try to control her son or daughter as compensation. This is the recipe for emotional abuse.

Sadly the Useful Idiots who have been on the Common Purpose training programmes feel they are acting in the Best Interests of the Children, whereas they are in fact acting in the best interests of the collectivists and globalists intent on destroying families and children so soften them up for the future dictatorship being rolled in under the radar, except it’s being picked up at long last, hence Brexit, Trump and Rome Referendum.

General Characteristics of Emotionally Abusive MothersMaking the child/teen feel responsible for the mother’s feelings.

Threatening them in general.

Threatening them specifically with rejection or abandonment.

Threatening them with vague, unstated consequences.

Using force upon them.

Invalidating their feelings.

Laying undeserved guilt on them.

Placing undeserved blame on them.

Dominating the conversations.

Refusing to apologize.

Always needing to have the last word.

Judging or rejecting their friends.

Sending them to their rooms for crying.

Locking them out of the house.

Using punishments and rewards to manipulate and control them.

Invading their privacy.

Under-estimating them.

Failing to show trust in them.

Labeling them.

Criticizing them.

Giving them the silent treatment.

Failing to give them real explanations.

Giving non-explanations such as “because it is wrong” or “because it is inappropriate” or “because it is a sin”

Slapping

Teen Torment: Overcoming Verbal Abuse at Home and at School

Ref: www.eqi.org S. Hein